OpenAI and the White House have implicated DeepSeek of utilizing ChatGPT to inexpensively train its brand-new chatbot.
- Experts in tech law say OpenAI has little recourse under copyright and contract law.
- OpenAI's regards to usage might use but are largely unenforceable, they say.
This week, OpenAI and the White House accused DeepSeek of something akin to theft.

In a flurry of press statements, they stated the Chinese upstart had bombarded OpenAI's chatbots with questions and bphomesteading.com hoovered up the resulting information trove to quickly and inexpensively train a model that's now practically as excellent.

The Trump administration's leading AI czar stated this training process, called "distilling," totaled up to intellectual home theft. OpenAI, meanwhile, wiki-tb-service.com informed Business Insider and other outlets that it's investigating whether "DeepSeek may have wrongly distilled our models."

OpenAI is not saying whether the business prepares to pursue legal action, rather assuring what a representative called "aggressive, proactive countermeasures to protect our technology."

But could it? Could it sue DeepSeek on "you stole our content" grounds, much like the grounds OpenAI was itself took legal action against on in a continuous copyright claim filed in 2023 by The New York Times and [rocksoff.org](https://rocksoff.org/foroes/index.php?action=profile